• Home
  • About
  • Privacy Policy
Wednesday, June 11, 2025
  • Login
CHINA-ARMS
  • Home
  • General
  • New Weapons
  • Army
  • Air Force
  • Navy
  • Rocket Force
  • Exercises
  • Global
  • Politics
  • Wiki
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • General
  • New Weapons
  • Army
  • Air Force
  • Navy
  • Rocket Force
  • Exercises
  • Global
  • Politics
  • Wiki
No Result
View All Result
China-Arms
No Result
View All Result
Home World Military

UK Reveals Russian Secrets: NATO Not the Threat, Russia Watches PLA

March 4, 2024
in World Military
Reading Time: 3 mins read
A A
0
319
SHARES
2.5k
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

You Might Also Like

Serbia Deploys China’s FK-3 Air Defense System: A First in Europe

Speculations Arise Over Chinese Support in Iran’s Interception of Israeli Missile Attack

US Air Force’s Doubts on Sixth-Generation Fighter Program: A Strategic Deception or Genuine Setbacks?

The Financial Times of the UK recently reported a major news story revealing the conditions set by the Russian military for the use of nuclear weapons in the event of the conflict in Ukraine. According to the conditions outlined in the decrypted Russian document, the Russian military might initiate tactical nuclear strikes if the enemy invades and destroys 20% of Russia’s strategic nuclear-powered submarines. Similarly, if the enemy invades Russia and destroys three or more large surface vessels, three airports, or other significant facilities, the Russian military might also resort to tactical nuclear strikes.

If a country invades the Russian Far East while the Russian military is occupied with fighting in Ukraine under NATO support and unable to attend to the Far East territories, the Russian military would inevitably resort to nuclear strikes. From the contents disclosed in the document, especially the last condition, the only country that actually fits this criteria is China.

Firstly, the United States has no intention of directly landing in the Russian Far East across the Bering Strait, as the U.S. currently has no intention of engaging in a “hot clash” with Russia. Neither South Korea nor Japan is likely to do so, given the vast difference in their national capacities compared to Russia, and non-nuclear South Korea and Japan lack the audacity to provoke Russia, a nuclear military power. Therefore, China is the only plausible option. Historically, the Far East and Siberia were part of China’s ancient territories, only becoming separated after the Ming and Qing dynasties, but after the founding of the People’s Republic of China, only the current territory remains. The Chinese people, who harbor strong sentiments for their lost territories, eagerly await their return, which is internationally recognized. Secondly, the People’s Liberation Army, during its most impoverished and difficult times, dared to confront the peak period of the Soviet Union and engaged in military conflicts such as the Zhenbao Island incident. Although it ended peacefully, it alerted Russia to the vigilance against its neighboring country.

Lastly, and most importantly, in recent years, the Russian military has conducted joint military exercises with the People’s Liberation Army multiple times, whether in joint search and rescue operations, joint operations, or military confrontations. The Russian military lags behind the People’s Liberation Army in terms of equipment, personnel quality, and efficiency of command systems.

One of the most notable instances was during the “Vostok-2018 Sino-Russian Joint Military Exercise,” where a battalion of the People’s Liberation Army, accompanied by a medium-sized composite battalion, swiftly “annihilated” a Russian motorized rifle regiment. Russian Minister of Defense, Sergei Shoigu, was deeply impressed by this military exercise and realized the gap in military capabilities between the Russian military and the People’s Liberation Army. Therefore, after the commencement of the “Special Military Operation in Ukraine,” he naturally prioritized the People’s Liberation Army. For the Russian military, NATO is not a formidable enemy; although NATO may have military technological advantages, the Russian military also has a nuclear advantage. This is why they have been on guard against the People’s Liberation Army.

In addition to conventional military power overwhelmingly favoring the Russian military, China surpasses Russia in technology, research and development, industry, and finances. The various types of drones flooding the Russo-Ukrainian battlefield are essentially at the level of “small factories and workshops” in China, where drones sold to children and hobbyists are even more advanced than them.

Furthermore, the People’s Liberation Army also possesses a large number of nuclear arsenals and a mature land-based anti-missile system. If they were to make a swift advance, the Russian military might not be able to respond promptly. Therefore, the Russian military has deployed more than 15 nuclear missile bases in the Far East, employing layered defenses to buy time to react.

Tags: China and Russia
Previous Post

052D Destroyer Shocks with YJ-18 Anti-Ship Missile’s Unexpected Range

Next Post

Failed Negotiations and Military Buildup: Mainland’s Next Move to Cut Off Kinmen’s Taiwanese Military Supply Line?

Related News

Serbia Deploys China’s FK-3 Air Defense System: A First in Europe

Serbia Deploys China’s FK-3 Air Defense System: A First in Europe

January 5, 2025
0

An image released by the Serbian Ministry of Defense on December 30, 2024, showing troop personnel monitoring the FK-3 air...

Speculations Arise Over Chinese Support in Iran’s Interception of Israeli Missile Attack

Speculations Arise Over Chinese Support in Iran’s Interception of Israeli Missile Attack

October 30, 2024
0

On October 26, Iran's air defense forces reportedly intercepted multiple missiles launched by Israel in a pre-dawn attack, successfully neutralizing...

US Air Force’s Doubts on Sixth-Generation Fighter Program: A Strategic Deception or Genuine Setbacks?

US Air Force’s Doubts on Sixth-Generation Fighter Program: A Strategic Deception or Genuine Setbacks?

July 1, 2024
2

Recently, Hu Shuotianxia, a military commentator from mainland China, published an article stating that the US Air Force's claim to...

Su-57 Destroyed; Chinese State Media Criticizes: ‘Repeatedly Breaking Records for Embarrassment’

Su-57 Destroyed; Chinese State Media Criticizes: ‘Repeatedly Breaking Records for Embarrassment’

June 11, 2024
1

According to the website of the Ukrainian Ministry of Defense, on June 8 local time, a Russian fifth-generation stealth fighter,...

Next Post
Failed Negotiations and Military Buildup: Mainland’s Next Move to Cut Off Kinmen’s Taiwanese Military Supply Line?

Failed Negotiations and Military Buildup: Mainland's Next Move to Cut Off Kinmen's Taiwanese Military Supply Line?

North Korea Supplies Russia with 6,700 Containers of Ammunition, Sending Chills Down South Korea’s Spine

North Korea Supplies Russia with 6,700 Containers of Ammunition, Sending Chills Down South Korea's Spine

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow us

No Result
View All Result

YouTube channel of China-Arms

Chinese Air Force Enhances Training with Simulations
Chinese Naval Academy Recruitment Video
72nd Group Army Trains Combat-Ready Squad Leaders
00:00:00 PLA Central Theater Army
00:02:31 Xinjiang Military District Border Regiment
00:02:47 China’s Armed Police in Tibet
00:03:06 Gulf of Aden Escort Fleet
PLA Central Theater Forces Carry Out War-Ready Exercises and More
Chinese Army Engages in CBRN Defense and Amphibious Landing Exercises
Inside China’s Latest Army Training
China’s Plateau Sharpshooter – Yang Yougang, Elite of the Armed Police
The 71st Group Army Conducts Air Defense Drill
Chinese Army Amphibious Armored Vehicle Drill
Load More... Subscribe

Recent Comments

  • Masud on PLA Showcases Heavily Modified Amphibious Armored Vehicle with HJ-10 Missiles
  • X on Three Type 055 Destroyers Head to South China Sea for Six-Day Naval Exercise
  • FabioM on Three Type 055 Destroyers Head to South China Sea for Six-Day Naval Exercise
  • A on Three Type 055 Destroyers Head to South China Sea for Six-Day Naval Exercise
  • O'Brien on J-16’s heavier payload than F-15EX demonstrated

Tags

China's Aircraft Carriers China's arms exports China's homemade aircraft carriers China's homemade aircraft engines China's hypersonic weapons China's J-31 stealth fighter China's military drones China's military exercises near Taiwan China's Military Reform China's space weapons China's Su Series Fighters China's Tibet Military district China's Type 055 destroyer China-India Border Conflicts China-Pakistan military cooperation China-US tensions China and Japan China and Russia China vs Russia military China vs USA military power China’s Eastern Theater Command China’s Stealth Fighters Chinese J-10B fighter H-6K bomber H-20 stealth bomber India vs China military power comparison J-10C jet fighter J-16 fighter J-20 fighter jet J-20 vs F-22 Japan vs China military PL-15 air-to-air missile Russia-Ukraine war South China Sea Disputes The Taiwan Issue Type 003 aircraft carrier Type 075 amphibious assault ship Type 15 tank US-China war risk WS-10 Taihang engine WZ-10 attack helicopter Y-20 military transport aircraft Z-20 helicopter Zhang Zhaozhong Zhuhai Airshow 2021

Profile

China military news since 2015.

Archives

© 2015-2024 China-Arms

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • General
  • New Weapons
  • Army
  • Air Force
  • Navy
  • Rocket Force
  • Exercises
  • Global
  • Politics
  • Wiki

© 2015-2024 China-Arms

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.